You may have noticed I took some time off for R & R. The 305 archived columns, however, saw
frequent visits.
The hiatus gave me an opportunity for introspection. It enabled me to
re-examine my purposes and the best methods of achieving them. As my visitors
know, I do this for eleemosynary purposes. I have no pecuniary interest: no
advertising, no dietary supplements to sell, no book to promote; there’s
nothing in it for me. I do this, with the help of a great volunteer editor, for
purely educational purposes.
As I said in The Nutrition Debate #114, “My Insulin Dependent Type 2 Pharmacist,” I started writing this column because a
friend in my community – who was a registered pharmacist – died, unnecessarily
and tragically. He was a Type 2 Diabetic. In 1986 when I was first diagnosed a
Type 2, he helped me pick out my first blood glucose meter, and he filled my
first prescription for an oral anti-diabetic medication.
That’s when my pharmacist told me that he was an insulin-dependent Type
2. He followed his doctor’s orders – and the advice our government has dispensed
for half a century – and his disease progressed to its inevitable conclusion. His
death was a waste. It didn’t need to happen that way. And that’s my motivation
and my message.
With that in mind I have decided to focus my efforts on a large underserved
segment of the diabetic population. I
want to explore an aspect of Type 2 Diabetes care that is little understood and
generally ignored by the medical and pharmaceutical communities: the self-management
of Type 2 Diabetes by the patient and
how best to do it.
I am especially interested in reaching what the medical community calls
the “treatment-naive” patient, that is, someone who is newly diagnosed (as
Pre-Diabetic or Type 2 Diabetic) and
has never been subject to any “treatment.” Such patients are at a critical
juncture, and denial is an extremely tempting option. Typically, the patient
just defaults into a dependent state and accepts their doctor’s ministrations
(as we usually do in healthcare matters). However, a diagnosis of Pre-Diabetes
or Type 2 Diabetes is actually a great time to look into what this disease is
really all about and learn what you, the
patient, can do about it. As a well informed patient, you can self-manage your
diabetes care under your doctor’s watchful eye and “supervision”?
Self-management of Type 2 Diabetes is a mutually beneficial
arrangement. Doctor’s know that Type 2 Diabetes is largely a patient managed disease. They call it “patient-oriented”
care, but that still leaves the impression that patient care is a collaboration
that the doctor manages. I’m sorry, but as
far as dispensing dietary advice is concerned, most doctors and conventionally
educated and certified Registered Dieticians aren’t qualified to manage the
care of Type 2 diabetics. So, in the days, weeks and months between doctor’s
appointments, you will manage your diabetes care, and at the office visit
your doctor will order tests and monitor (not manage) your improvement. Alternatively, if you default to
medical management, after initially getting your blood sugar under control with
drugs, your doctor will simply manage,
and record, the progressive worsening of your condition.
You, the patient, know full well that “doctor’s orders” to “try hard to
diet, exercise and lose weight,” aren’t easy to follow and aren’t enough. You’ve
seen friends and relatives struggle. Something must be wrong with the “prescription,”
you’re thinking. The doctor knows it too, but the only arrow in the quiver of
the otherwise uninformed or, sadly, misinformed clinician is, “More medications
could be used.” That’s the road my poor pharmacist took, and look what it got
him – progressively worsening disease… and then a slow, premature death.
Therefore, the new focus of “The Nutrition Debate” will be “Type 2 Diabetes: A Dietary Disease.” It
will begin with this post (#306) by the eponymous title. Then, the next posts
will be #307, “Preface, A Personal Story
(n = 1),” and then #308, “An
Introduction to What Causes Type 2 Diabetes.” The first is my bona fides – my “credentials,” as it
were. The second post is an overview of the science, as I see it. These will be
followed by #309, “Type 2 Diabetes Q & A: 20 Brief Vignettes,”
each fewer than 150 words (4-pages total) in Q & A format.
Further posts will
return to the manifesto that drives this new focus: that Type 2 Diabetes is a Dietary Disease. I welcome comments and
“debate.” After all, I have taken a very strong position which, as I see it, is
irrefutable. Of course, although I consider myself “informed,” mine is just “A
Personal Story: n = 1,” and “Your Mileage May Vary (YMMV).” But, if you read “An Introduction to What
Causes Type 2 Diabetes,” it’s difficult for me to see how anyone could look at
Type 2 Diabetes in any way other than that Type
2 Diabetes is a Dietary Disease.”
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteIt's been pretty well documented over the centuries that T2D is a self-inflicted malady. You might not have been pointing the gun ("guidelines" do that for you), but you pulled the trigger.
ReplyDeleteI like that. You have to accept responsibility for your malady FIRST -- if you are going to do something about it. Thanks, as always, Ash, for staying "on target."
DeleteWelcome back..
ReplyDeleteHH
Thanks, Helen. I'm feeling good about it. I'm losing weight again, by eating VLC more strictly, and hopefully my A1c will show a nice improvement too. I'll know in a day or two when my doctor sends me the results of my latest labs. He's very good that way.
DeleteUpdate: My A1c dropped 0.4%. Next test is in April. My lipids were stellar. TC=186, HDL=78, LDL=100, TG=39.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Muneer. Keep reading, for more insight and great stories.
ReplyDeleteI like your post. It is good to see you verbalize from the heart and clarity on this important subject can be easily observed. coupon code iherb
ReplyDeleteThanks, Deborah.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete