I’ve been struggling with this
question for a long time. Why what, you ask? Well, that’s the problem. It’s
hard to figure out what the question is. And then there’s the answer. That’s
even more of a conundrum.
As readers know, I’m not afraid
to be honest, even brutally honest. I don’t mind if I offend someone’s
sensibilities…if it’s in a good cause. And I believe passionately that the
health and well-being of our nation, even the world, both physically and
mentally, is a good cause. It’s worth telling the truth, even if at a cost.
I have put the question in
various forms: Why don’t people want to change? Why is it so hard for people
to change? Can a person change what one eats, or the way or when one eats, at
any age? Why don’t people believe that changing what they eat will improve
their health? Whom do you believe when it comes to what is a “healthy diet”?
Why should a person give up their favorite “comfort” foods? What if it’s all
been a big fat lie?
As I approach column #500, I’m
frustrated. I’m no closer to the answer as to why others can’t/don’t/won’t
change than I was when I started. I can only re-tell how I did it and
hope that somehow connects with you.
In 2002, as I approached the
end of my work life, I weighed 375 pounds and faced a short retirement; I
looked around and didn’t see many obese old people, and those I did see didn’t
look to me to be in good health. I had been a diagnosed Type 2 diabetic for 16
years, was maxed out on 2 oral meds and starting a 3rd. My
prospects were that I would soon be injecting insulin. And sooner rather than
later I would die of diabetic complications.
The common Microvascular ones:
1) end-stage kidney disease with dialysis (nephropathy), 2) being wheelchair
bound because of amputation(s) (neuropathy) and 3) blindness (retinopathy).
Today, the Macrovascular complications are even more common: heart disease,
stroke, Alzheimer’s disease (“type 3” diabetes) and several cancers. I was
scared. I didn’t want a “short retirement.” I was motivated to change.
My doctor thought the best way
to treat my Type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure, was for me to lose
weight. He had urged me to do that for years. All “his” efforts – meaning my attempts – had failed. When I
lost weight, following his “prescription” to “eat less and move more,” on a “balanced diet” – I failed. Then, one
day, when I walked into his office (at 375 pounds), he said, “Have I got a
diet for you!” His timing was perfect.
A few months earlier my doctor
had read, “What If It's All Been a Big Fat Lie,” the cover
story of The New York Times Sunday
magazine. The author, Gary Taubes, who
also wrote Good
Calories – Bad Calories, proposed an “Alternate Hypothesis” to the
“low-fat” (high-carb) “balanced” diet that mainstream medicine has pushed for
fifty years. And note well, following it dutifully has made us fatter
and sicker.
Taubes,
thrice an award-winning science journalist, wrapped up GC-BC with 10 “certain
conclusions [that] seem[ed] inescapable” to him. The first 3 follow; the
others are in The Nutrition Debate #5, posted here.
1.
Dietary
fat, whether saturated or not, is not the cause of obesity, heart disease, or
any other chronic disease of civilization.
2.
The
problem is the carbohydrates in the diet, their effect on insulin secretion,
and thus the hormonal regulation of homeostasis – the entire harmonic ensemble
of the human body. The more easily digestible and refined the carbohydrates,
the greater the effect on our health, weight, and well-being.
3.
Sugars
– sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup specifically – are particularly
harmful, probably because the combination of fructose and glucose
simultaneously elevates insulin levels while overloading the liver with
carbohydrates.
No comments:
Post a Comment