I’ve just read Gary Taubes’s “The Soft Science of
Dietary Fat,” published in Science (2001).
It’s an early look into a subject that’s since come a long way. I believe it
was a foundational piece that was the impetus for his later work.
I read it looking for a way to understand why a
friend who has been a Type I diabetic for over 70 years “believes absolutely”
that saturated fat and dietary cholesterol are bad for our health and should be
avoided. I’m not trying to change her
beliefs. She’s a survivor and an expert on how to manage her disease. I just
want to understand why.
Taubes doesn’t need me to defend him either. He
“studied applied physics at Harvard and aerospace engineering at Stanford (MS,
1978,”) and then “took his master’s degree in journalism at Columbia University
in 1981.” “He has won the Science in Society Award of the National Association
of Science Writers three times.” After “The Soft Science of Dietary Fat,” he came
to the public’s attention with his blockbuster July 7, 2002 New York Times Sunday Magazine cover
story, “What If It’s All Been a Big Fat Lie?” It was the “2nd coming”
of the low carb era.
After 5 years of research and writing Taubes went
on in 2007 to publish his magnum opus,
“Good Calories – Bad Calories” (“The Diet Delusion” in the UK). In an “Afterwords”
in the paperback edition, Taubes admits that this epic tome had less impact on
the medical establishment than he would have liked. A more accessible book,
“Why We Get Fat: And What to Do About It,” came out in 2010. In 2011 he was back
on the cover of The New York Times
Magazine with “Is Sugar Toxic,” and in 2016, he published, “The Case Against
Sugar,” another NYT best seller.
Many physicians and researchers have attributed to
Taubes the inspiration for their career direction. He certainly has inspired
me. He’s responsible, indirectly I suppose, for the name of this blog, “The
Nutrition Debate.” As a “nutrition groupie,” I bundle my own experience with
ideas I’ve had and those of experts I read daily to put it “out there” for the
world to consider. If the light level behind the mirror of conventional
thinking is raised, perhaps the world will come to see the “alternate
hypothesis” that Taubes describes in “Good Calories – Bad Calories.” Perhaps,
the silver lining of the mirror will dissolve and be transparent. The following
is excerpted from Taubes’s 2001 essay.
“The original simple story in the 1950s was that
high cholesterol levels increase heart disease risk. The seminal Framingham
Heart Study, for instance, which revealed the association between cholesterol
and heart disease, originally measured only total serum cholesterol. But
cholesterol shuttles through the blood in an array of packages. Low-density
lipoprotein particles (“bad” cholesterol) deliver fat and cholesterol from the
liver to tissues that need it, including arterial cells, where it can lead to
atherosclerotic plaques. High-density lipoproteins (“good” cholesterol) return
cholesterol to the liver. The higher the HDL, the lower the heart disease risk.
Then there are triglycerides, which contain fatty acids, and very low-density
lipoproteins (VLDLs), which transport triglycerides.”
“All of these particles have some effect on heart
disease risk, while the fats, carbohydrates, and proteins in the diet have
varying effects on all these particles. The 1950s story was that saturated fats
increase total cholesterol, polyunsaturated fats decrease it, and
monounsaturated fats are neutral. By the late 1970s – when researchers accepted
the benefits of HDL – they realized that monounsaturated fats are not neutral.
Rather, they raise HDL, at least compared to carbohydrates, and lower LDL. This
makes them an ideal nutrient. Furthermore, saturated fats cannot be quite so
evil because, while they elevate LDL, which is bad, they also elevate HDL,
which is good. And some saturated fats – stearic acid, in particular, the fat
in chocolate – are at worst neutral. Stearic acid raises HDL levels but does
little or nothing to LDL. And there are trans fatty acids, which raise LDL,
just like saturated fat, but also lower HDL. Today, none of this is
controversial, although it has yet to be reflected in any Food Guide Pyramid.”
Well, the Food Pyramid is gone, only to be
replaced by “My Plate,” arguably a worse representation of a healthy eating pattern.
But the modern movement that Gary Taubes spawned has gained enormous momentum.
Today, it is a legacy to the work begun by Gary Taubes and his seminal piece, “The
Soft Science of Dietary Fat?”
No comments:
Post a Comment