I couldn’t believe this headline in
my Medscape Alert email, so I opened the link and read the lede: “NEW YORK
(Reuters Health) – Lifestyle changes made by people at high risk of diabetes
appear to reduce their chance of developing the disease over the next two
decades…” This revelation was also
made by a group of doctors. However,
that Reuters would assign a reporter to it, and then issue the story from New
York, was utterly amazing to me.
The study was first reported online in
the April 2014 Lancet Diabetes and
Endocrinology. The original study began in 1986 and ended in 1992! In it,
568 people in China with “higher-than-normal blood sugar levels but not high
enough to be diagnosed with diabetes,” were placed into three intervention
groups (diet, exercise, or diet plus exercise), and a control group. The
current study, begun in 2009, compared medical records of the 430 participants
and 138 controls.
The goal of the original researchers
(in 1986) was meritorious: “Diabetes is strongly associated with the increased
risk of cardiovascular event and mortality,” the lead investigator of the 2009
study told Reuters. “They wanted to see if lifestyle changes, which included
diet modifications and exercise, would help lower death rates.” As it turns
out, they did, especially for women. But “because there
are no data on people’s lifestyle habits during the (original) study period,”
“it’s impossible to say…how the participants responded to the interventions,”
the new study said. Okay.
But wait, we do have some data on the
diet intervention. It “was meant to help people lose weight and
normal-weight people reduce the amount of simple carbohydrate [sugars] they ate
and the amount of alcohol they drank.” The Chinese understood in the 1980s the
role of carbohydrates in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease. So, it is
all the more bewildering to me that the lead investigator would say today, “We
have to do something active to delay the development of diabetes in high-risk
populations.” How could that be any plainer? What was he unable to see?
The results of the 2009 study were impressive. “By the end of 2009,
they determined that 28% of the intervention group had died, compared to 38% of
controls.” “Twelve percent of the intervention group had died of heart-related
conditions, compared to 20% of controls.” And, “Almost all of the benefit was
found in women – there was very little difference in death rates among men
based on whether they went through one of the lifestyle programs.”
The Reuters piece also reported, “The
researchers also compared diabetes diagnoses and found that 73% of the
intervention group had developed diabetes through 2009,” a very high number
indeed but still lower than the control group’s 90%. Reuters related that the Lancet piece reported, “Those finding
were similar for men and women.”
The big takeaway from this story,
though, was: “The group-based lifestyle interventions over a six-year period
have long-term effects on prevention of diabetes beyond the period of active
intervention.” The researchers concluded, “It is worth taking active
action to prevent diabetes to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and
mortality.” Now, if only they could figure out what the action should
be… Maybe there’s a clue in the paragraph above that begins, “…we do have some
data on the diet intervention:” “…THE
AMOUNT OF SIMPLE CARBOHYDRATES (SUGARS) THEY ATE…”
The first 3 comments online were
“interesting.” The first, by a pharmacist, was “…and they discovered the
warm water.” I’m not sure of the allusion, but I’m pretty sure the comment is
intended as sarcasm. The second comment is from an advanced practice
ob/gyn nurse. It was, “Oh wow, this is groundbreaking!” I’m almost certain (and
hopeful) that this is pure mockery. The third comment was from a
physician. He said, “Useful study.” If my impressions are correct, and I admit
to a confirmation bias here, the pharmacist and the nurse were better informed
about diabetes nutrition than the doctor. That, of course, is sad and all the
more reason to lament the lack of
nutrition education in medical school (see Retrospective #208, “Teach
Doctors Nutrition”), and the misinformation being disseminated by our
government, the medical/big pharma cabal and the big food manufacturing
industries in the world today.
Perhaps the value of reporting over
and over again the self-evident truth about low-carb eating to lose weight and
improve health outcomes has some value after all. Eventually, more and more
doctors will open their minds to the science they should have learned when they were in medical school. I can
hope, anyway…
The Mediterranean "Diet," when being called a "diet," is used because of its low use or consumption of saturated fats, "bad" cholesterol, red meats, salt, and processed goods Pita Way
ReplyDeleteDiabetes is reversible. I am talking about the most common form of diabetes which is type 2.
ReplyDeleteI have reversed it in so many cases myself and there are documented cases of thousands of people who have reversed diabetes with the help of experts.
Glucose is the sugar which is used by every cell of the body to produce energy. This is carried by a hormone insulin to most of the cells. When sugar levels are high, the cells do not allow sugar inside and that is when we say Insulin has become ineffective. i.e. Insulin sensitivity has come down and the condition is known as Diabetes when excess sugar starts to circulate in the blood.
Even the fat cells no longer store sugar. So any activity which burns energy will make your insulin sensitive and push glucose inside the cells reducing your sugar levels in the blood. When the intake of sugar is reduced, a similar result is observed.
It takes a long time for the body to reverse diabetes and the body needs a lot of nutrients, as in a diabetic State the body is depleted of many nutrients.
Diabetics are prone to infection and other chronic diseases like kidney failure, heart disease etc.
Therefore it is important that you reverse the diabetes with a controlled and customized diet and not by yo yo dieting like reducing food intake. I definitely think that every parent needs to check out the site www.DiabetesReversalTactics.info if you’re serious about reversing your type 2 diabetes.
Good luck!
Nabila