I’ve been writing this column since
2010. I started posting once a week, then twice, now, as Retrospectives, daily rewrites
at thenutritiondebate(dot)com. Some readers follow me by RSS feed, others on
Facebook and twitter, yet others by a link from other sites. Most readers,
however, are still introduced to “The Nutrition Debate” by Google searches on
topics of interest to them.
Blogger provides me with some simple
statistics or my readership by day, week, month and all-time. It also tracks my
audience by country, traffic source, and post (column), so I have a broad idea
of who, how and what my readership is.
Only 40% of my readers are in the U.
S. The Ukraine and Israel garner a little less than 10% each. Russia, France
and China come next, then Germany, Canada and the UK. Interestingly, Poland
rounds out the top ten. Once in a while I get 1,000 pageviews in a 1-hour period from Israel. Obviously,
someone who follow me there posts a link on their site.
I also have loyal followings in
Sweden, Hong Kong and Singapore. The Singapore readership in on a site where a
very popular and avuncular social network leader writes on the subject of
“Clean Eating.” He provides occasional links to my columns and has even posted
a few as permanent resources for his followers.
It’s interesting to me that I have so
many readers in Ukraine-Russia and China. I suppose that people there have
“hijacked” my content (with or without attribution, who knows?) and appear to read
everything I write. Some sites are commercial (e.g., department stores), others
are pornographic sites. All are in a Slavic language. I don’t object, mind you.
I write this column for educational purposes. There is no revenue, and I have
no interest in commercializing it.
This might also be a good time to
mention that I have a wonderful and intrepid volunteer editor, a person who
makes my writing clearer, checks my facts, and whose digital resources are
almost as vast as Google’s (slight exaggeration there). Her acumen in all
things health and nutrition is only exceeded by her generous heart and her
interest in spreading the word about good nutrition and healthy eating. I am
unabashedly in awe of her.
So, since Google seems to be the
main, continuing source of new readers, I encourage this method of using that
search engine. Just as Google has a “feeling lucky” search function, you could
do the same. Just type “The Nutrition Debate” (in quotes) in the “window,” (or,
thenutritiondebate(dot)com), hit “enter,” and let ‘er rip. I guarantee that my
blog will come up on the first page, or in the latter case, first.
Of course, if you want to do a more targeted search, you could do
something more “advanced.” Enter “The Nutrition Debate” and another word or
phrase of interest to you (or a column number, i.e., #xxx. Let Google do the
work! To see how well this works, I just entered “the nutrition debate
triglycerides” and all ten (10) Google
results were columns that I have written on triglycerides. This works
very well in the absence of “tags,” “labels,” or “key words.”
On the other hand, if you’d like to
see a list of all the columns I’ve written, in some browsers you
can see a list.“The Nutrition Debate List of Columns, appears at the top right
corner of the post, listed under “Favorite Links and Videos.” This works in
Chrome, but, alas, not in IE.
So, if you are one of those who rely
on Google (or another search engine), as I do, I encourage you to try this “advanced
search technique.” I am too much of a Luddite, or troglodyte, and too lazy at
this point, to go back over 500 columns and enter tags, labels and key words.
Use technology to search instead. It works for me. Just Google “the nutrition
debate” and another key word or phrase, and press “enter.”
Then, if you like what you have read,
go to the RSS feed and get my blog delivered every morning to your hand-held
device, tablet, laptop, or work station. And please, send me your comments and
ideas. I’m always looking for your feedback and subjects of interest to you, me
and my readers. It’s helps me get educated too.
No comments:
Post a Comment