David Mendoza was a low-carb dieter
and popular Type 2 blogger who in 2014 wrote an article about chronic systemic
inflammation and low-carb dieting in Health Central. In it he referred
to another article he wrote in Health
Central in 2009. They were both interesting, but what really caught my
attention was a link Mendosa provided to a PubMed abstract titled, “Advice to
follow a low-carbohydrate diet has a favorable impact on low-grade inflammation
in Type 2 diabetes compared with advice to follow a low-fat diet.” The full
text is available from the Annals of
Medicine.
His 2009 piece began, “More and more
research pinpoints inflammation as a root cause of Type 2 diabetes.” He went on,
“Type 2 diabetes generally results from the combination of impaired beta cell
function and insulin resistance acting on susceptible genes.” In his 2014 piece,
Mendosa relates these two disparate phenomena with a quote from Dr. Richard K.
Bernstein, the Pied Piper of very low carb dieting and blood glucose monitoring
to manage diabetes.
Mendosa, quoting
Bernstein from his encyclopedic book, Diabetes Solution:
“To
simplify somewhat, inheritance plus inflammation plus fat in the blood feeding
the liver causes insulin resistance, which causes elevated serum insulin
levels, which cause the fat cells to build even more abdominal fat, which
raises triglycerides in the liver’s blood supply and enhances inflammation,
which causes insulin levels to increase because of increased resistance to
insulin.”
If that vicious cycle is too “geeky”
and confusing for you – it is to me – then the “Advice to follow…” article
above, a Swedish study, is not. The title says it all, very succinctly: “A low-carb diet has a favorable impact on
low-grade inflammation in Type 2 diabetes compared with a low–fat diet.”
The Abstract’s BACKGROUND sets up the study: “Inflammation may play an
important role in Type 2 diabetes. It has been proposed that dietary strategies
can modulate inflammatory activity.”
The “low-carb” diet used in the study
was 20% carbohydrates. That’s 100 grams of carbohydrate a day on a 2,000
calorie a day eating plan. The low-fat diet was 55-60% carbohydrate, or 275 to
300 grams of carbohydrate a day. This is the amount, if you didn’t know, that
the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends for women of a certain age who
eat 2,000 calories a day. It is also the amount on which the Nutrition Facts
panel of packaged and processed foods is based. That’s a stunning revelation to
most people. If you don’t believe me, check it out for yourself.
To my thinking, 100 grams of carbs a
day is at the very high-end of
low carb. Perhaps it was chosen as the “low-carb” amount for the study so as to
be seen as “achievable” by people just starting out in low-carb eating. It is
certainly achievable by anyone who gives it a good faith try. It certainly must
be acknowledged that cutting carbohydrates by two-thirds, from 300g/day to 100,
is no small feat. But it is enough reduction for most people who are not
already diagnosed Type 2s. And it would make management with medications for
diagnosed Type 2s much easier. Finally, it may
make reversal of Pre-diabetes
possible for people whose glucose tolerance is not already too badly impaired.
So, what did this randomized,
real-world study reveal? RESULTS:
“Both the low-fat diet and low carb diets led to similar reductions in body
weight, while beneficial effects on glycemic control were observed in the low
carb group only.” In addition, using various clinical laboratory measures,
after 6 months, inflammatory markers “were significantly lower in the low-carb
group than in the low-fat group.” Quod erat demonstrandum (Q.E.D.)
Note the C-Reactive Protein (CRP), a
common inflammation blood marker, of the low-fat dieters actually increased 18% from1.41 to
1.67mg/L, while the CRP of the low carb dieters decreased 22% from 1.12 to 0.87mg/L.
CONCLUSION: “To conclude, advice to follow a low-carb diet or a
low-fat diet had similar effects on weight reduction while effects on
inflammation differed. Only the low carb diet was found significantly to
improve the subclinical inflammatory state in Type 2 diabetes.”
Has your CRP level been
checked recently? Has it ever been done? Ask your doctor. I have it done
annually.
Thanks for your beyond belief blogs stuff.how to jump higher to dunk,
ReplyDeleteTake a companion with you to class. Having somebody to stay with you can do miracles to help lighten that sentiment of dread.
ReplyDeletePhenq Review
semenax has been proven to increase cum volume, sperm count, and sperm motility in both human males and lab rats.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for sharing this information, this will surely help me in my work and therefore,
ReplyDeletehttps://hardmenstore.weebly.com/
https://sites.google.com/site/hardmenstoreofficial/
https://medium.com/@hghgenf20plus/semenax-2019-9e612e4aec7e
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/increase-semen-volume-scot-maria/
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteA few colleges have additionally set up their own organic exploration groups to help in the improvement of organic agribusiness. Organic cultivating still has far to go, and all the better you can do to help is to purchase organic items. Curcumin 95 ingredient distributor and supplier for natural supplements
ReplyDelete